Today is Blog Action Day 2014! Since 2007, bloggers from around the world have been coming together every year on the 16th of October to write a blog post on a different theme or issue. The aim of this day is to raise awareness about these important issues, to connect communities, organisations and individuals who are passionate about tackling it, and to offer up ideas and solutions for ways in which the problem could be reduced.


This year the theme is INEQUALITY.

Inequality is a word that everyone is familiar with. Everyone knows that global wealth distribution is unequal. Everyone knows that we don’t all have equal rights. Everyone knows that millions of people around the world suffer from social exclusion and injustice. The trouble is, not everyone knows how stark this inequality actually is.

See some more Oxfam facts on inequality here.

As I’m currently taking a Development and Inequality module at university, I’ve already been exposed to some of this information. However, it doesn’t take much work to find out what is happening to global wealth distribution and the direction that it is taking. The truth is, even though many statistics note that developing countries are fast becoming richer and global poverty seems to have been decreasing, the disparity of wealth distribution around the world is more extreme than it has ever been.

This is a really good infographic video that summarises this well.

I find these statistics both shocking and overwhelming. How can we even begin to try and make a positive impact when the inequalities are just so unimaginably vast? Oxfam’s 2014 report, ‘Working For the Few’, states that today, the richest 85 people own as much wealth as the poorest half of the entire world. I might be wrong, but I highly doubt that any of those 85 people are reading this blog. Though we may have the money to feed and clothe ourselves, pay for our healthcare, our education and earn a disposable income big enough to pay for holidays and leisure activities, only a select few people have the means to make multi-million dollar investments in overseas aid and development. Yes, we can do our part: donating to charities, volunteering, raising awareness about these issues etc, but what impact can we really make when the system that so benefits the wealthy is the same one that exploits the poor? How can we persuade the world’s wealthiest people to share their wages more fairly? Is it even right that we should ask?

I certainly don’t have the answer. However, these questions did remind me of a TED talk that I watched a few months ago, where Bill and Melinda Gates spoke about their philanthropy.

Even towards the beginning of Microsoft’s success, Bill and Melinda had already been talking about giving the wealth that Microsoft generated back into society. Presently, the couple have donated over half of their assets to The Gates’ Foundation, and are actually persuading (with apparent success) other billionaires to do the same. If you don’t want to watch the whole video, watch from 20 minutes in where this is discussed.

The Gates’ Foundation has done amazing overseas development work operating principally in healthcare, to try and reduce infant mortality rates (the number of children dying under five) all over the world. By vaccinating children against easily preventable diseases, whose families would have otherwise lacked the knowledge or finance to afford treatment, families become more stable as parents can be more certain that their children will survive and can plan accordingly. When this happens, family sizes actually begin to reduce, as mothers concerned about the survival of their children actually tend to have more in the hope that they will be able to raise at least a few to adulthood. Though it may seem illogical when first observed, reducing infant mortality rates in developing countries where the population is growing exponentially does actually result in a slowing of population growth, as well as healthier, happier human beings with far better life prospects than those without vaccinations to life-threatening diseases.

Developing healthcare systems in these poorer enclaves within developing countries reduces regional inequality, as more and more people are gaining access to the healthcare facilities that they need and deserve. This is good news, and having such influential people behind the cause for reducing inequality is sure to raise awareness and help this project gain further momentum. I highly recommend that you read the Gates Foundation Annual Letter which debunks myths about foreign aid and highlights the positive outcomes of their work so far.

When discussing inequality, it seems natural for our minds to jump to this type of overseas aid, focusing on development at a national scale and comparing the ‘poor’, developing nations of the global south to our own prosperous, developed nations, where surely everyone lives a comfortable life and benefits from the wealth of the establishment that governs them. What people don’t often think about is the inequality within their own country, or city, or town. In the UK, a nation whose citizens benefit from free healthcare, the right to education, a national minimum wage, welfare benefits for struggling families and a whole host of others, how could people possibly be living in poverty? As someone who has never experienced life below the breadline, nor been surrounded by it, I find this question difficult to get my head around. I have always viewed my home country as one where people are given the best start in life, and where well-planned systems prevent everyone (bar a miniscule proportion of people) from falling into a real and seemingly inescapable poverty trap. Unfortunately, even in a country with the seventh largest economy in the world, one fifth of the population lives below its official poverty line.

Here is another useful video showing the extent of inequality in the UK.

To think that one out of every five people in the UK is struggling every single day just to get by, feed their families and raise their children as best they can is shocking and upsetting. Redundancy, or even something as small as a broken appliance or unexpectedly large bill may be enough to render people completely helpless. A few months ago I read a story about a teenage girl whose family were made homeless because of something like this, and was enough to prevent them from being able to pay for their home any longer. Now, though she continues to attend school and see friends, she is living permanently in a homeless shelter.

This is not a one off.

Perhaps one of the most hard-hitting truths about poverty in the UK is that more and more people are going hungry. In a 2013 report entitled ‘Walking the Breadline’, a collaborative project between Oxfam and Church Action on Poverty, it was estimated that 500,000 people are now reliant on food aid. They labelled this a ‘national disgrace’, considering the UK’s commitment to ensuring every citizen has access to the food that they need. The explosive rise in the number of people relying on food banks has been connected to rising unemployment and food/fuel prices, where minimum wages and welfare benefits have not increased in correlation with inflation, leaving many people in destitution.

Here is some information on food poverty provided by Oxfam.

Food prices have risen by 30.5% in the last five years, which is double the rate of inflation and two and a half times the increase rate of the National Minimum Wage. This imbalance means that people are eating less food today than five years ago (7% less) but are paying 20% more for it. Further austerity cuts that have the biggest impact on the poorer population only serve to exacerbate what is already a critical issue. Benefit caps, cuts and sanctions seem only to target the nation’s most vulnerable and push them further into the poverty trap. Food banks report that the majority of those accessing the service are low income, working households in crisis. 62% of children in poverty are living in families where at least one parent has a job, indicating that the current Minimum Wage legislation is simply not enough to lift people out of poverty.

Imagine yourself walking into a supermarket and surveying aisle after aisle of food around you. Piles of freshly baked bread. Bundles of fresh fruit and vegetables. Stacks and stacks of tinned produce. Ready meals and on-the-go sandwiches prepared by hand. Gallons and gallons of milk. Fizzy drinks. Water. Imagine seeing all this food around you, knowing that 300,000 tonnes of food is wasted by supermarkets every year, and still going home hungry.

There is no excuse for freezing welfare benefits in a cruel economic climate where prices for essential goods are rising faster than ever. People living in this situation have been stripped of their freedom and their dignity. It is a social injustice that should have been eradicated from developed countries long ago. We have the food and we should have the means to feed every single person who lives here.

So what can we do?

Firstly, we need to exert pressure on the government to close tax loopholes and enforce stricter tax avoidance penalties, as every pound that wealthy individuals and corporations dodge is another pound that is stripped from the essential services provided for the people that need them. We also need to pressurize the government to stop targeting the nation’s most vulnerable people, and instead to reduce austerity cuts and focuse more on taxing the rich companies and people who are currently in a position to feed themselves a million times over, every single day.

We need to campaign for the Minimum Wage legislation to be replaced by a fairer Living Wage– one that is more appropriate and reflective of the current economic climate and inflation.

We should support local food charities which aim to feed those who require emergency food aid, as well as more long term projects where people are growing sustainable, organic produce without excessive waste, and can therefore provide cheap, healthy and nutritious food for people who need it.

Help out your friends and neighbours; you never know who might be suffering in silence. We cannot end food poverty alone, but we can be part of the solution.

Let’s fix this together,

Megsy x


4 thoughts on “BLOG ACTION DAY 2014

  1. It’s all well and good taking the ‘tax rich people more and raise benefits’ stance, but there’s so much abuse of the welfare system whereby people feel entitled to an amount without giving anything back. For every one family abusing the system you could probably afford to keep 5 family operating within their means above the poverty line.

    Dealing with taxation of rich companies and individuals is far from clear cut. Bear in mind that the government is not actively trying to screw its constituents over. I’m of the opinion that they have the nation’s best interests in mind. When they leave a loophole open it’s generally to encourage a company to continue interfacing with the UK economy instead of heading elsewhere. This has far reaching (albeit difficult to estimate) effects which stimulate the economy (e.g. corporations bring employment. which leads to spending, generates VAT, which goes back into education and making the country more attractive .etc). It’s a positive spiral and it’s all too often overlooked.

    I therefore think it’s more beneficial in the long term to try to eradicate the “live off the state” mindset, especially in young people. It’s a social issue rather than an economic one, and it’s one that is seen infrequently in other countries. Obviously you can’t do it overnight but certainly efforts to instil a sense of self-preservation into people from an early age through the school system would go a long way.


    • Actually, benefit fraud only costs the UK £1.5 billion a year, and is mainly committed by people on very low income whose poverty is likely to have driven them to crime. Tax avoidance and evasion, committed mainly by very wealthy people, costs the UK £35 billion a year at least.

      Though there is abuse of the welfare system, it is far less than the numbers you are estimating, and the eradication of this would do nothing to keep other families above the poverty line. The view that people on benefits are scroungers who ‘don’t give anything back’ is a view that has been circulated by a wealthy, middle class sector of the population who I highly doubt have ever experienced poverty. The percentage of those on benefits who commit fraud is absolutely minuscule when compared to the percentage of individuals and corporations within the UK who hold their money in off-shore tax havens and use other methods of tax avoidance to prevent their money going back to the into society. Though corporations do stimulate the economy, I think it is fairly ‘clear cut’ that if the mindset of ‘I won’t pay my share for the essential services that the state provides for me’ is far more damaging to the UK economy and its people than the tiny percentage of people who use the welfare system to their advantage (which is near impossible to do seeing as it is so heavily policed).

      I implore you to remember the original meaning of the word ‘welfare’- to help people in need. These people are not in poverty because they are lazy and suffer from a ‘live off the state’ mentality- this idea is simply incorrect. These people are in poverty because the salaries they receive from their jobs are not enough to keep them afloat in a society where the minimum wage is not a living wage, and does not rise regularly with inflation. These are also people with disabilities who are unable to work. These are people with hungry mouths to feed.

      Perhaps the societal issue that actually needs to be addressed is a lack of empathy and sense of fairness, where rich people feel that their money is not owed to the government to be able to improve the quality of life of the nation’s poorer population, as these people must be stupid and lazy for having been exploited by the capitalist system.

      To blame people for not being able to earn enough money to live is impractical and ineffective. Instituting a living wage would enable these people to contribute far more to the economy, as they would have that essential income to buy more goods and services. It would stimulate the economy far more adequately than saying to people in poverty, ‘we won’t raise the minimum wage, but learn to be self sufficient anyway.’


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s